In a recent event that has sparked both concern and debate, Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, known for her tenure on the House Science and Space Committees, made several scientifically inaccurate statements regarding astronomy.
During an engagement at a high school, she described the moon as being "made up mostly of gases" and possessing its own energy at night. These remarks have raised eyebrows, given the moon's solid composition and its reflective, not generative, relationship with light.
NEW: Democrat Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee says the "full moon" is "mostly made up of gases" while speaking in front of a bunch of high schoolers.
"A full moon is that complete rounded circle, which is made up mostly of gases."
Oh, it gets better. After getting called out for her… pic.twitter.com/jVFW6yUq1N
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) April 9, 2024
Jackson Lee's comments did not stop at the moon's composition. She further suggested that, unlike the sun, the moon is more approachable due to its supposed lesser heat and gaseous state. This comparison starkly misrepresents the fundamental nature of these celestial bodies, as the moon does not emit its own light or heat but rather reflects sunlight. Her assertion that humans could potentially live on the moon due to its gaseous atmosphere directly contradicts NASA's explanations regarding the moon's inhospitable environment.
This is not the first instance of Jackson Lee's astronomical confusions coming to light. A notable episode from her past involved a mix-up between the moon and Mars, where she inquired about the American flag Neil Armstrong planted – but on Mars instead of the moon. Such errors, especially coming from a Yale graduate and a member of relevant congressional committees, underscore the critical need for accurate scientific knowledge among public figures.
Sheila Jackson Lee said that the Moon is made up of gases but we can live on it because the gases are "manageable." Now she claims she was talking about the Sun, which would mean that she thinks we can live on the Sun. So her excuse is that she didn't mean to say that dumb thing.… https://t.co/iquRHyNQIo
— The Honorable Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) April 10, 2024
The implications of these inaccuracies extend beyond mere factual errors; they touch upon the broader issue of scientific literacy in education and public discourse. When influential figures misrepresent basic scientific facts, it risks undermining public understanding and trust in science. This is particularly concerning in an era where "trust the science" has become a rallying cry for addressing global challenges, from climate change to public health crises.
Moreover, Jackson Lee's attempt to use special eclipse glasses, which resulted in confusion and amusement among observers, serves as a metaphor for the larger issue at hand. It's not just about understanding the specifics of astronomy but about fostering a deeper respect and comprehension of science as a whole.
As we navigate an increasingly complex world, the importance of scientific literacy cannot be overstated. It is essential for informed decision-making, critical thinking, and fostering innovation. Public figures, especially those with influence over educational and scientific policies, bear a significant responsibility in this regard.
In conclusion, while everyone can make mistakes, repeated misunderstandings of fundamental scientific concepts by those in positions of power highlight a pressing need for better science education and communication. As we strive towards a more scientifically literate society, let us remember the value of accuracy, curiosity, and humility in our pursuit of knowledge.
NO WONDER WHY THEY WANT TO TAKE SCIENCE OUT OF HI SCHOOL
AND THIS IS A COLLEGE GRADUATE
What a freaking joke this person is !!!! Another prime example of the results of the
“DEI and WOKE” agendas. Also probably another good example of the
“Welfare to Washington Syndrome” like others in Congress today. A major dumbass !!!
In Jackson Lee’s case, Harvard, in her case, was accepting of her ethnicity and not her basic knowledge or test scores. Amazing.
Gives you some idea of the value of a Yale degree. Was she merely given a degree for boxes checked?
And these are the people trying to take over the teaching of our children. no way. we must stop the fools. we need an equivalency test for politician now after hearing some of these democrat politicians speak. OMG.
This is NOT a case that “underscore[s] the critical need for accurate scientific knowledge among public figures.”
This is a case where so called ‘public figures’ that are truly this stupid should never be allowed to remain in office. Any office. Federal, state or local.
Clearly she is a proud Yale ‘affirmative action’ graduate. Not there due to intelligence, but due to melanin.
We are paying people like THIS to represent us . . . on a SCIENCE committee?!? you DON’T say!
Tis is what some people voted for
WHY , do people keep voting democrats in office, and not only democrats but one,s that just do not have a clue .
She can’t figure out what a woman is, but knows what the mom is made of? Weird.
She can’t figure out what a woman is, but knows what the mom is made of? Weird. I
So which democrat was worried that a Pacific island would “turn turtle” causing everybody on it to drown? And wasn’t it the Hawaii representative (D) who asked Amy Coney Barrett if she had ever sexually molested anyone? How stupid are the supposed people in power and why do they think that most Americans share their stupidity?
When I was a little kid (long before anyone actually walked on that gaseous blob) there were people who ‘believed’ the moon was made out of green cheese AND that there was no back side since no one had seen it.